|
|
Posted by John Henry on 08/23/05 21:12
Onideus Mad Hatter <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in
news:80lkg1lfadiik37relgnb1o7ab0j0bveng@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:30:06 -0400, smallfoot <tip@toe.foot> wrote:
>
>>In article <6rekg1lqfmboqh13jpembfk3498pti7l1g@4ax.com>,
>>usenet@backwater-productions.net says...
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> And yet my sites are more cross browser copatible than yours,
>>> >>>> you flaming retard. Huh, funny that.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Prove it.
>>> >>
>>> >> ...um, I already have you drooling moron.
>>> >
>>> >No you haven't. Give me a list of screenshots from different
>>> >browsers and operating systems that show my sites not working where
>>> >yours do.
>>>
>>> Well<EVASION CLIPPED>
>>
>>He told you to "prove it" and all you can respond with is evasive
>>whining. What's the matter? Can't you back your claims? Rhetorical
>>question.
>
> He's the one who needs to back it up, Cheerleader.
No, no I don't. YOU claimed that your sites are "more cross-browser
copatible [sic]" than mine. So prove it. Show me even one browser that
your site works in and mine doesn't.
> I've already got a
> ton of user feedback telling me what my sites work with and what they
> don't.
<insert 'The Lurkers Support Me In E-Mail'>
> All he's got is ASSumptions
And ten years' experience plus half an associates' degree in web design.
I'd be getting the other half now, but I've got too damn much work to
handle full-time school and full-time web design. Plus the degree was
just window dressing for my resume anyway - if I'm making it on my own, I
don't really *need* window-dressing for my resume.
> and I'm certainly not gonna go and
> do his dirty work for him. Rule number one in web design...unless you
> tested it, assume it doesn't work.
Tested in IE, Firefox, Opera, Konqueror, and the text portions in Lynx.
I don't have a mac, but I do have friends who use macs, and none of them
have reported any current problems. I also participate in several
mailing lists and so forth, to ensure that I can have a wide variety of
browsers and platforms when I say "site check, please."
Does *anyone* here have a problem seeing my sites, other than the high-
bandwidth area of roadlesstraveled.com (which makes heavy use of
graphics, iframes, and javascript, and is therefore not likely to work in
legacy browsers)? Can you, DB, provide a genuine screenshot of my site
'not working' or being 'incompatible' with any modern browser?
Hey, here's an idea!
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lowgenius.com%2F
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.backwater-
productions.net&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline
Valid HTML sucks. Way to avoid having yoru customers find out that you
can't code for shit, DB.
Jesus CHRIST!
Your fucking front page is taking me over a minute to load on a cable
connection!
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//www.backwater-
productions.net/wwcc/yoga-online/
Result: Failed validation, 11 errors
I'd check your other client sites, but oh, gee, it looks like they've
changed providers. Funny, that.
Idiot.
--
John Henry
alt.usenet.kooks Hammer of Thor - May 2005
NEW site! www.lowgenius.NET
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|