|
|
Posted by AF on 08/24/05 17:52
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 09:47:34 GMT, Jim Scott <mr.jimscott@Xvirgin.net>
wrote:
>I know that several here do not use FP and I understand their reasons.
>However are there any of you who DO use FP?
>Just interested, as people who are content with things tend to get on and
>say nothing.
I use it in two ways:
1. to support older sites I either inherited or which are small & have
uncomplicated designs and for which I do not have the time to convert.
2. to do a quick, simple page design and see it, colors, fonts, etc.
so I can adjust a font, color size etc. Sometimes after a late night
and even with much caffeine, I can not always see what html code will
look like, so FP is quick for doing this.
I usually don't publish with FP for the reasons others have listed. I
tend to use it for simple design.
If anyone has a WYSIWYG editor they like better than FP, I'd like to
hear about it.
Also if this editor helps with FTPing pages or transferring them and
also if it generates good clean code, something FP does not do, I'd
love to hear of it.
Finally FP seems easier than most editors I have worked with in
cutting, pasting, and organizing pictures, graphics files, etc. I
work occasionally with other web sites, and if I have the permission
of the web site's owner to use graphics, it is far easier to cut and
paste graphics into FP and hav it save the files than with other
editors.
Again I do not publish with FP, but use it for design tasks.
Please let me know if anyone has something better. I am not a fan of
FP or Microsoft.
Best regards,
Al
http://www.affordablefloridainsurance.com
http://www.americanbestmortgages.com
http://www.americanaffordablelifeinsurance.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|