|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 08/26/05 02:42
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:52:33 +0100, Mimic <dev@null> wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah I don't get all the hype. It's like these people have been
>> closed up in a box where all they've ever seen has been text only
>> websites and now that they got one with a few ho hum, outdated CSS
>> parlor tricks they're all drooling all over themselves. Over in the
>> REAL web design communities we're all just cockin our heads to the
>> side and sayin, "Huh?". Especially regarding their 1024x768 non
>> text-liquid layout, how is THAT supposed to be "cutting edge"? Also I
>> highly doubt it's as cross browser compatible as people are claiming.
>> It seems like some screwballs are saying that just because it's W3C
>> compliant...usually meeting W3C specs means that it's NOT cross
>> browser compatible since no web browser on the planet ACTUALLY meets
>> the W3Cs imaginary standards.
>Oh pray tell, what and where are these "REAL web design communities" ?
Obvious you're not up on places like UltraShock.
>Because outside of wally wally land, in the *REAL* world, Zeldman,
>Bowman, Shea, Berners_Lee et al are highly acclaimed web architects.
Who can't even build a liquid text site? *snicker* Apparently the
"*REAL* world" is a few shades deficient from "wally wally land" where
we consider people like Brian Zick to be "highly acclaimed web
architects": http://www.brianzick.com/
>Not only do these people produce quality, usable and accessible websites
That static 1024x768 layout is all about "usable and accessible" is
it? LOL, I remember when you stupid bitches acted like the whole
fuckin WORLD was gonna end when I did a static 1024x786 layout on the
NP Index site...now these stupid bitches do it and it's all "okay"
because they're "*REAL* world" "highly acclaimed web architects".
*snicker*
Apparently "highly acclaimed" means you can pretty much do an absolute
shit job and morons like Mimic will still be singin yer
praises...yeah, remind me not to ever gain THAT status...*shudder*...
>that are visual appealing,
....that site really isn't that visually appealing. In fact it's a
very minimalist design, meaning it's supposed to be more functional
than visually appealing.
>they also guide the industry on web standards and practices.
Oh?
>As such, Berners-Lee heads the W3C,
And what a bang up job they're doing of "guiding the industry on web
standards"...you know, what with how NO WEB BROWSER IN EXISTENCE
actually meets those standards...which is sorta interesting when you
consider that the peeps who make up the W3C are corporations like
Microsoft, Mozilla, etc, etc. I mean, they're setting standards that
even THEY don't meet...yeah, think about it. You got lied to, Bitch.
>Zeldman runs a world renowned emag,
A "world renowned emag", eh? ROTFL...yeah, sure kid, sure. I don't
think ANY "emag" could be considered "world renowned".
>has written books
....so have quite literarily hundreds of thousands of other assholes.
>and setup the Web Standards Project
>(WaSP),
Oh hey, just what we need, ANOTHER group of assholes who thinks they
should be the ones setting the "standards".
>and people like Shea run sites that develope and aid the
>webdesign industry, such as the CSSZenGarden.
*snore*
>Hatter seriously, people are trying to help you.
Uh huh, sure kid. All I'm seein is that the same stuff I was doing
TWO YEARS ago that you were bitching incessantly about is suddenly
bein slurped up by all you deficient little assholes. Apparently that
means that *I* set the standards and you stupid bitches are just two
years out of date.
>Whether you believe
>what we say or not is upto you. But rest assured, you are NOT years
>ahead of everyone else in webdev. What you are doing isnt done by
>professionals for the simple fact that it doesnt work and/or isnt
>suitable or productive.
Of course it's not, I mean it requires a shit load of skill to be able
to use say Flash in a manner that's as productive as deficiently
easier alternatives (which aren't as cross browser compatible, cross
platform compatible or cross resolution compatible). There are really
only a handful of people on the entire fuckin planet who even have
that level of skill. Because of that, no, it's not something that's
going to be implemented by every stupid jackass who runs around the
net claiming to be a "world renown web architect".
>You've only just jumped on the Flash craze from
>the LAST CENTURY,
Actually no, Stupid. The "Flash craze" as you call it from the "LAST
CENTURY" was all about using Flash from an animation
perspective...however recently Flash has gone from something that used
to only be good for animation to an incredibly powerful web
development tool...of course, like I said, it ain't easy (yet) which
is why the stupid deficient bitches like you haven't all jumped on the
new Flash bandwagon. But hey, I give ya morons two years, I'm sure
Flash related app makers will have made it real cookie cutter for you
drooling retards by then.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|