|
|
Posted by Mimic on 08/27/05 01:08
kchayka wrote:
> Mimic wrote:
>
>>Wÿrm wrote:
>>
>>>Annoying part of layout is that it's designed 1024x768 minimum resolution.
>>
>>I noticed the res thing too. Im sure they have their reasons.
>
>
> I imagine ALA's only reason for setting a fixed width (regardless of
> what that width might be) is because they have never bothered to make a
> flexible design before. Why start now?
>
> Ironically, I always thought ALA was most usable with stylesheets
> disabled. Looks like that still holds true. :(
>
>
It is actually liquid, just designed with a min full browser in a res of
1024*768, which isnt asmuch of an issue as it used to be
--
Mimic
"The man who awaits the rising of the sun, cannot wait forever."
[email: ZGF0YWZsZXhAY2FubmFiaXNtYWlsLmNvbQ==]
Help Stop Spam - www.hidemyemail.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|