|
|
Posted by Mimic on 08/27/05 01:12
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:55:08 +0100, Mimic <dev@null> wrote:
>
>
>>Noodles Jefferson wrote:
>>
>>>In article <pan.2005.08.24.01.49.28.559351@127.0.0.1>, PerfectReign
>>>(root@127.0.0.1) dropped a +5 bundle of words...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:19:25 +0100, Mimic pretented somebody gave a rat's
>>>>ass and spewed forth:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>A List Apart have just released their redesign.(like within the last 8
>>>>>hours :P)
>>>>>Given the amount of webdesign talk around here, I think alot of people
>>>>>could do with looking at it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Looks GREAT, 100% valid code and xbrowser compatible. Take heed.
>>>>>
>>>>>www.alistapart.com
>>>>
>>>>Very cool, dude. I passed this along to some of my co-workers, as we've
>>>>been trying to get pure CSS-compatible code done, where we even exclude
>>>>the use of tables as in this site.
>>>>
>>>>Unfortunately, a few of my developers - when I gave them this link - asked
>>>>if it could be done in Front Page.
>>>>
>>>>sigh...
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I have to admit, that's a pretty incredible layout. I don't think I've
>>>seen anything like it. That No. 201 picture's freaking me out. You
>>>can't make an underline do that, it has to be a rollover effect but I
>>>can't a link to a js file, no script tags, no nothing. SO HOW IN THE
>>>HELL IS HE DOING IT? The underlining for the headers too. That big one
>>>where only the ends are highlighted. How the hell's dude doing that
>>>too? The layout's just incredible. I'd like to pull some nifty ass
>>>tricks like that.
>>>
>>>I see but I cannot believe. Like I said, I don't think I've seen
>>>anything like it. Goddamn.
>>>
>>
>>Simply the power of CSS. Something certain people in this group like to
>>ignore in place of old and less effective technologies such as js ;)
>
>
> CSS isn't a replacement for JavaScript, Kid.
And who said it was? Lets see, shall we do our effect using the most
widely support technique, or shall we fuckup our userbase and use
something less supported. Hell, why dont you go out and code a brainfuck
stylesheet.
> In fact CSS is pretty
> limiting without the use of JavaScript. Not that it matters, they're
> both deficient in comparison to Flash/ActionScript.
>
> --
>
> Onideus Mad Hatter
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH OMFG, there it is again LOL
"In fact CSS is pretty limiting without the use of JavaScrip"
LOL, thats right hatter Im having fun. Im having fun laughing at your
stupidity and inability to grasp the SIMPLE technologies of the
internet. LOL
--
Mimic
"The man who awaits the rising of the sun, cannot wait forever."
[email: ZGF0YWZsZXhAY2FubmFiaXNtYWlsLmNvbQ==]
Help Stop Spam - www.hidemyemail.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|