|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 08/27/05 10:21
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 00:07:59 -0700, "^reaper^" <knocking@deaths.door>
wrote:
>While sipping absinthe, Onideus Mad Hatter heard a loud sucking noise
>coming from alt.2600, and hastily inscribed the following unintelligible
>Sanskrit in <news:9cjvg1p0p8o26pktudpqbu8rg48rh8tt67@4ax.com>:
>
>> Coming from teh moron who thinks compression = efficiency you'll have to
>> forgive me if all I can do is snicker at your naivety.
>
>That's a rather lame attempt at deflection considering I was talking about
>code optimization and not data compression.
Oh, I'm sorry, how ~exactly~ does it differ, Kiddo?
*Hatters gonna go pop himself a beer for this one.*
>No matter.
No, no, let's hear it, Reaper, I wanna know ALL about how you think
compressing code is different from compressing data. ^_^
>Since you bring it up, people no doubt figured out your compression "methodology" would be
>gossly inefficient after seeing this psot:
>
> <news:fpkmd1ldji3k8knp2uj3jiq47qlicmeasn@4ax.com>
....where do I say anything about my encoding methodology in that post?
I actually attempted to come up with the most dumbed down version of
what I was ACTUALLY trying to do so as not to give anything away.
Leave it to a dumbass like you to think it was something uber sekrat.
Yeesh, how fuckin stupid are you?
And BTW, Deflection Projector, how does this change the fact that you
think compression equals efficiency? Stay on track, Kiddo, yer
startin to skip.
>Though... it is nice to see you finally admitting it. Your next assignment?
>Try to figure out /why/ your "methodology" is so inefficient and get back
>to us (tinu), m-kay?
Oh, just so you know, what you suggested...that's what produced this:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/sonofabitch.png
So thanks for the inefficient errors, Stupid. The method that Raist
suggested actually turned out to be the superior method. Apparently
you should be bowing to his coding skill. *snicker*
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|