|
|
Posted by jake on 08/28/05 12:42
In message <Xns96C06BB8279F2jkorpelacstutfi@193.229.0.31>, Jukka K.
Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> writes
>"Morgan" <southclean1@O2mail.ie> wrote:
>
>> Dead Wrong, go to this site and use a little program called WEFT 3
>
>Every once in a while, someone pops up with such suggestions, and then
>remains silent (or starts babbling, insulting and talking about other
>things) when asked to present her or his example of _actual_ use of WEFT.
>(Actual as opposite to trivial pages presented as demos.)
And the difference is .....................?
>
>The reason is that if you try to use WEFT for anything real, you get into a
>hopeless mess.
>
Completely untrue, of course.
We have been through this nonsense before, haven't we?
regards.
--
Jake
(jake@gododdin.demon.co.uk .... just a spam trap.)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|