|
Posted by Roy Schestowitz on 09/25/89 11:25
__/ [Els] on Tuesday 30 August 2005 11:42 \__
>>>>> dual-head display is a bit tricky on a laptop :-)
>>>>
>>>> I thought about one which unfolds horizontally. Now, if only I had the
>>>> resources to design and manufacture a laptop... *smile*
>>>
>>> Once you get round to it and have found resources, make it a triple
>>> already. Easier to unfold; no need to slide the unfolded display to be
>>> centered.
>>
>> Also a matter of equilibrium!
>
> Speaking of which, the triple display laptop may turn out to be rather
> heavy.
There are no free lunches.
>>> It can't be all that difficult to manufacture for a company
>>> that already does regular laptops - maybe there is some reason they
>>> don't?
>>
>> Someone may have thought about it, but...
>>
>>> Seen from the top, the display could either be in this position:
>>> ____.____.____
>>> |....|
>>> |____|
>>>
>>> for personal use,
>>> or in this one:
>>>
>>> /\
>>> / \
>>> /____\
>>> |....|
>>> |____|
>>>
>>> to display whatever you'd want to show to other people sitting at the
>>> same table.
>>
>> You just blew my mind!
>
> Hope it didn't hurt ;-)
I never said "ouch". *wink*
>> My supervisor has projectors in his offices and he
>> sure could use something like that his laptop. Let's start a business
>> together *grin*
>
> I'm afraid we'd need a third party in possession of resources <g>
Me... that's one... you... that's two... so, yeah... we need a third party.
Have you got Steve Job's number?
> [paranoia]
>>> Only if you let it :-)
>>
>> I usually do. Too many times. Maybe Dave will be after me now...
>>
>> http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2005/08/30/black-hat-seo/
>
> Yup, saw that already - clever avoidance of names ;-)
>
> The key to avoid paranoia is tell yourself to be as ignorant as
> possible I guess - Never assume someone is after you until they
> actually show up on your doorstep. And then offer them coffee or tea -
> ignore the possibility of malice :-)
Thanks for the advice. It helps.
Roy
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|