|
|
Posted by Alan J. Flavell on 09/04/05 00:32
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, nAnd0 wrote:
> "David Dorward" <dorward@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:dfcodd$6h$1$830fa7b3@news.demon.co.uk...
> >
> > Dump the table. Simplify your markup.
[...]
Looks like good advice to me (as usual from this respected poster, of
course)
> Thanks for the advice.. Im sure your recommendations are what I SHOULD
> do, but unfortunetly I know little of html .. not to mention CSS and any
> sort of present html coding standards.
Perhaps the group would be better able to help if we knew how you got in
this mess in the first place.
(Hunch:) if you extruded this HTML from some wannabe-WYSIWYG authoring
tool, then the kind of variation between browsers that you're complaining
of is frankly no big surprise, but I couldn't really recommend manually
wading through the mess of dubious HTML that it has produced. It's going
to waste a lot of your time and effort for some one-off result that might
or might not work on the next page you have to deal with.
My advice, for what it's worth, is that you'd do better to spend that time
on looking into the kind of thing that David was recommending. There's a
learning curve, sure, no mistake there, and not helped by the shortcomings
of some current browsers, but it's the way things are going, and rates to
get you ahead of the field.
good luck
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|