|
|
Posted by "messju mohr" on 09/13/05 14:23
ups...
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:08:08PM +0200, messju mohr wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:56:33AM +0200, Ivo Jansch wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > messju mohr wrote:
> >
> > >> cache_groups only work, if you leave out the template parameter of clear_cache().
> >
> > Isn't that a bug then?
>
> no.
>
> > I thought cache_id's were meant to be able to have multiple cached
> > versions of a single template. So a 1->N relation between template and
> > cache_id.
>
> a cache_groupd is a groups of *pages*, and not a group of templates.
this should read: a cache_group is a group of *pages*, and not a group of templates.
> you don't cache a template, you cache output (which may consists of
> multiple templates when {include} is in use).
>
> you't don't want to clear templates with clear_cache(), you want to
> clear pages.
>
> > If what you say is true, then 2 different templates, each using the same
> > set of cachegroups (tpl a, group nl, group en; tpl b, group nl, group
> > en) would not work?
>
> it that would not work as *you* seem to expect, yes.
this should read: that would not work as *you* seem to expect, yes.
> > This would mean I would have to add the template name to the cache
> > group, or developers could by accident use the same id's and clear
> > eachothers templates.
>
> see above.
>
> > Greetings,
> > Ivo
> >
> > - --
> > Ivo Jansch <ivo@ibuildings.nl>
> > ibuildings.nl BV - information technology
> > http://www.ibuildings.nl
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> >
> > iD8DBQFDJqJR95NUnGFZm9cRAn87AJ9OIheWocnk1MHvypv1y2KHrT255gCeI/N5
> > OXniUH5+VJIQFmkVooY5e9g=
> > =tUYW
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|