|
|
Posted by Jochem Maas on 03/04/05 18:14
Rob Adams wrote:
> One correction. The include('lib/test2.php') is actually a
> require_once('lib/test2.php'). That's why it quits and I don't get the
> third include.
you 100% sure your include_path is '.' ? just asking.
also you mention a /www/lib and a /www/include dir - maybe thats
the problem?
maybe you can make the problem go away by setting include_path to
'.:/www/include' or '.:/www/lib'
I must say I think its overkill to use file_exists() on files
you are going to require_once() - although no doubt there is a good
reason to do it sometimes :-)
it is odd though, file_exists() returns true yet the file cannot
be included.
--
any chocolate chips in this cookie jar care to enlighten the crumbs?
>
> -- Rob
>
>
> "Rob Adams" <rob_adams@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:20050304155533.31138.qmail@lists.php.net...
>
>>From the manual on 'include':
>>
>>"Files for including are first looked in include_path relative to the
>>current working directory and then in include_path relative to the
>>directory of current script. E.g. if your include_path is ., current
>>working directory is /www/, you included include/a.php and there is
>>include "b.php" in that file, b.php is first looked in /www/ and then in
>>/www/include/."
>>
>>I have a file in my root dir (we'll call it /www) that includes the file
>>/www/lib/test.php as follows:
>>include('lib/test.php');
>>
>>test.php looks like this:
>><?
>> echo 'Inside first included file.';
>> if (file_exists('lib/test2.php'))
>> echo 'This file exists.';
>> include('lib/test2.php');
>> echo 'Ending first included file.';
>>?>
>>
>>/www/lib/test2.php exists. Whenever I run this, I get the first two echo
>>statements, without getting the third one. The error log reports that it
>>couldn't find lib/test2.php. If I take out the 'lib/' in the include
>>statement, it works. According to the description from the manual, either
>>way should work. Has anyone ever come across this problem before, and is
>>there a config setting that causes it? I'm stumped here, and I refuse to
>>go change all the code when from what I've read it should already be
>>working.
>>
>> -- Rob
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|