|
|
Posted by "Thomas" on 09/28/05 13:16
Thanks, that looks good. But what do I do if OS is WinDoze? The install of
the pecl only gives a .so *feeling sorry not everything runs on xp* ...
I will take the time to benchmark the serializing vs db calls ... is there a
good benchmark tool out there (without having to use microtime inside the
scripts)?
Thanks
T
-----Original Message-----
From: Jasper Bryant-Greene [mailto:jasper@bryant-greene.name]
Sent: 28 September 2005 11:41 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] serializing result sets or what?
Thomas wrote:
> Q: What would be the best way to save db calls for large result sets?
>
> I thought about serializing the data and then caching it (with Cache_Lite
-
> maybe there will be a future inclusion of such a caching scheme into the
php
> core or pecl?). I was not sure about performance though (no time for
> benchmarking this).
>
> The issue is that as this system grows we get 2 - 3 db calls on the server
> (which is too much in my opinion), but will serializing be cheaper or
simply
> the lesser of two evils?
A very similar question was asked recently on this list. You might like
to consider caching whatever you create from those result sets rather
than the result sets themselves, but APC [1] is worth looking at as I
believe it can cache (some?) PHP vars without serialisation, using
apc_store() and apc_fetch().
The only way to know whether such a scheme would help in your specific
situation is to benchmark. Go on, it won't take long!
[1] http://php.net/apc
--
Jasper Bryant-Greene
Freelance web developer
http://jasper.bryant-greene.name/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|