|
|
Posted by smallfoot on 10/12/05 16:18
In article <slrndkpv2s.iuf.pjr@nntp.petitmorte.net>,
pjr@NOSPAMkookbusters.org says...
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:17:15 -0500, Max of Mad <blah@blah.blah> wrote
> in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
> > Robert Buchanan wrote:
> >
> >> What is it, Max of Mad? I'm really busy in alt.usenet.kooks and I don't
> >> have time to respond to just anything...
> >>
> >>
> >>> Robert Buchanan wrote:
> >>>
> >>> <snip>
> >>>
> >>>> No. Why don't you just plonk us? It would be easier for you to do
> >>>> than all this whining you're engaged in.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> It would be easier. But then an NG would have all you spammers to
> >>> deal with.
> >>>
> >>> Accepting spam is wrong, IMHO.
> >>
> >>
> >> Your incredible ignorance is mildly amusing. Who among us is spamming?
> >>
> >
> > How's that? Do tell.
> >
> >>
> >>> So, something will be done about it.
> >>
> >>
> >> What's that? Are you going to whine to our ISPs because we posted harmless
> >> silly nonsense in an unmoderated group?
> >>
> >
> > Spammers post harmless silly nonsense too. They do everything you do,
> > crosspost, go on about bullshit that no-one has any interest in, etc..
> >
> >>
> >>> That is all.
> >>
> >>
> >> No, it isn't.
> >>
> >
> > Explain.
> >
> >>
> >>> bye bye.
> >>
> >>
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >
> > Yeah.
>
> Tell me, are you really totally clueless or are you a sock?
Or both?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|