|
Posted by Neredbojias on 10/21/05 21:59
With neither quill nor qualm, Travis Newbury quothed:
> Neredbojias wrote:
> > > Anicdotal data is meaningless. I have seen the opposite, therefore I
> > > am right?
> > Well, we know *that* can't be true...
>
> That's the problem with anicdotal data. It is all true.
He he, yeah... I must say that although this political discussion is
probably typical in meaningfulness, it's an elephant's ass better in
specific content.
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|