|
|
Posted by Robert Cummings on 11/05/05 09:19
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 02:17, GamblerZG wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:56, GamblerZG wrote:
> >
> >>Miles Thompson wrote:
> >>
> >>>You missed the most important: This list works, why break it?
> >>
> >>Nope, I did not miss it. It's just not a proper reply to the message. I
> >>did not suggest to disable mailing lists or change them in any way, so
> >>the "break" factor does not apply.
> >
> >
> > Then you suggest fragmenting the list into 3 factions, those who would
> > continue to use the list, those who would use the forum, and those who
> > would use both. By such a fragmentation of the list, solutions and
> > advice would be spread across multiple locations thus diluting the
> > efficacy of the list.
>
> I seriously doubt that giving people a choice over communication methods
> would reduce efficiency. It's like saying that having multiple OSes
> reduces efficiency of programming.
I didn't use the word efficiency, I used the word efficacy (feel free to
look it up).
Cheers,
Rob.
--
..------------------------------------------------------------.
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
:------------------------------------------------------------:
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily. |
`------------------------------------------------------------'
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|