|
|
Posted by Curt Zirzow on 11/30/05 08:13
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 04:59:55PM -0800, Max Schwanekamp wrote:
> Richard Heyes wrote:
> >Petr Smith wrote:
> >>I tried all and ended with
> >>http://www.phpguru.org/static/htmlMimeMail5.html
> >>fast, stable, usable.
> >A very good choice. ;-)
>
> But but but, what *is* the advantage of one over the other? I've been a
> PhpMailer devotee for some time. PEAR::Mail is too spare, PhpMailer is
> reasonably quick and has proven quite stable (I've built a couple
> newsletter apps using it). What's the advantage of Richard's package
> vs. the Pear one (on which he is a lead dev) vs. PhpMailer?
First off, the OT is rather to general to really know what is going
to be better, the only way to resolve it is to benchmark the
results, if you are sending one message heh.. good luck figuring
that out.
What i would be looking for is if there are tools to manage a
mailman list or ezlm list, i'd rather have an application that is
designed for sending out bulk emails than try to figure out what is
the best php Mail/STMP interface to send email to an MTA that will
most likely be the bottleneck anyway.
As for speed, you will most likly have a issues with the actual
STMP server or the MTA trying to send the documents. Even if you
speed up on how fast php can send email to a STMP server directly or
inject the messages to the MTA, the messages can only be sent as
fast as they can be delivered, thus any effort to make php sending
mail faster is rather futile.
Curt.
--
cat .signature: No such file or directory
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|