|
|
Posted by Brent Baisley on 10/04/50 11:11
I remember reading that UML was fairly complex. Although brief reading
up on it, it didn't seem all that hard. I think the next version is
supposed to be simpler. I made a decision about 6 months wether I was
going to learn UML or design patterns next. I chose design patterns,
and really think I made the right choice. I've picked up some UML in
the process, but more importantly, I amy planning for change much
better.
One of the mantras I've picked up is to figure out what changes in the
program and separate it out. How you separate it out is where design
patterns come in. I've discovered that design patterns help me plan
much better and code much better. After all, it's all about managing
change.
A few years ago I read an article about where UML was being used. It
was mainly in the big companies. Smaller companies found it slowed them
down when they needed to get their product to market quickly. This
pretty much worked well during the internet boom since it was mainly a
bunch of really good programmers trying to create a product that they
would see to the end. In a corporate environment, there is always a mix
of talent and there is no guarantee the whole group will be there for
the product life cycle. Thus UML is practically a must for a corporate
environment so that everything can be documented for the next person to
pick up quickly.
If it's just you and maybe a couple of other people. The "old
fashioned" way works very well. UML is great, but it will probably slow
the process down for the sake of good documentation. If you can, go to
your nearest paint store and pickup a can or two of chalkboard paint
and make an entire wall (or two) of your apartment, house or work, a
chalkboard. Wouldn't a 30ft x 8ft chalkboard be nice for diagrams?
For a really wicked thinking environment, get a few black lights, turn
off the lights, crank the music and work in the dark. The chalk glows
in black light, so you'll be able to see what you are doing.
On Mar 22, 2005, at 7:46 AM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
> [snip]
> So my question has to do with planning a project (not necessarily a
> website in general, but a programming project specifically). I've got
> Visio 2003 and a pad of paper with a pencil. I'm pretty much willing to
> try out different methods although I prefer a visual approach.
> [/snip]
>
> +1 for pencil & paper or whiteboard. And in the words of Obi Jay, "Use
> the flowchart Chris"
>
> I know that there is lots of excitement about UML, especially in light
> of PHP5's better implementation of OOP, but 25+ years of experience
> tells me that basic flowcharting, before UML (which is not as complex
> as
> some would like to make it), will save you several headaches down the
> road.
>
> Keep in mind that flowcharts are "living" docs....if you need to make a
> change to the code somewhere down the line you can (and should) change
> the flowchart to reflect it.
>
> Another good thing about a flowchart is its ability to describe the big
> picture as well as the most intricate detail.
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
>
--
Brent Baisley
Systems Architect
Landover Associates, Inc.
Search & Advisory Services for Advanced Technology Environments
p: 212.759.6400/800.759.0577
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|