|
|
Posted by John Salerno on 01/23/06 02:23
cwdjrxyz wrote:
> The moral of the story is that to write in XHTML and then just serve it
> as HTML, as many do is pointless, and you are better off just using
> HTML 4.01 strict.
>
Wow, I didn't realize that so many people were actually against using
XHTML in place of HTML. I would think that since it is the newest
technology, that it would be desired over HTML. I know it's been around
for 5 years, which is why it surprises me that browsers still don't
support it well. Now I'm confused all over again. I thought the decision
to use XHTML was a no-brainer, but now I'm reading a lot of posts
(including in this thread!) that seem to suggest XHTML isn't a good
thing right now...
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|