|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 09/07/05 18:09
With neither quill nor qualm, Els quothed:
> Neredbojias wrote:
>
> >>> Yeah, that's it. No couth and no class. Unfortunately, no character,
> >>> either.
> >>
> >> So... what made you fall for her then?!
> >> Temporary brain-loss?
> >
> > Well, she was a comely wench and prone to be supine in an endemic
> > manner. It was more like temporary gain in another organic arena.
>
> So I was right: temporary brain-loss.
It may not be entirely inaccurate to label it so, but you must remember
that men are merely victims of the evolutionary imperative. Were it not
for the stigmae of certain DNA sequences, sex would seem quite
disgusting in comparison to fusion or origination.
>
> >> The really really bad thing you did could easily have been a simple
> >> thing like choosing the wrong woman.
> >
> > Yes, that's what I did. 'Had suspicions early, too. But how can you
> > *know* before "the guillotine plummets"? The first 3 or 4 years were
> > pretty good...well, for the most part.
>
> So, either she had a different character in the first 3 or 4 years, or
> you still hadn't fully recovered from the 'temporary' brain-loss.
>
> > Ever notice how women can pull the nastiest, most
> > despicable tricks this side of Hades and then dismiss all with an airy
> > remark or flippant gesture that includes the middle finger in a
> > metaphorically sublime but nonetheless real sense?
>
> Actually, no, never noticed. They never try that with me really.
Of course not. Women stick together, However, it's not so much that
they are communally evil but rather that another woman simply doesn't
possess the gem-like qualities manifest by the male.
>
> >>>> "Jockstraps were first developed in the late 1800's to be worn by
> >>>> bicycle delivery boys by the Bike Company."
> >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jockstrap
> >>>
> >>> So for the entire existence of the human race minus a little over 100
> >>> years, men had no support.
> >>
> >> I guess no man has been inspired enough by that to invent such a
> >> simple thing as a jock-strap then.
> >
> > Men are like lions, tigers, certain anthropoids and other testeed
> > species of manifest destiny. They like to show the goods
>
> Some men actually think we like it when they make a showcase out of
> it.
It is understandable that with their advanced mental development at
least in relation to the bulk of the animal kingdom, women would prefer
a private display.
>
> > so that any
> > passing female may "cast her ballot accordingly when she goes to the
> > poles."
>
> Only a polar bear female would wanna make the effort.
But the efforts of a bare bipolar female can be much more entertaining.
>
> [different chat-up lines for different girls]
> >> Btw, how do you detect which category the girl is in before you start
> >> talking?
> >
> > If both her eyes and legs
> > fall helplessly open and she crosses herself in silent consternation
> > when she looks at my fly, she's a genius.
>
> I should have known you'd classify 'genius' like that.
Geesh, it was just a joke to lighten-up the mood. A smart girl knows
that men are typically on the make so when she wants to be typically
made, she doesn't wear panties.
>
> >>> -At least so it's generally generalized in the genuine journals of
> >>> geriatric generals.
> >>
> >> What noise annoys an oyster most?
> >
> > Pearl Jam?
>
> Probably. Clever find btw.
> However, personally I don't think Pearl Jam qualifies as 'noisy
> noise', but I do realize that opinions on that matter tend to greatly
> differ.
I like the group (-particularly their song "Black"), but they are a bit
dated. Of course, some maturer people still like Frank Sinatra, Elvis,
and The Police, so...
>
> >>>> Not only good with prose, but a poet as well!
> >>>
> >>> -From way back. I've penned o'er a hundred bodacious odes and wrote
> >>> some more in pencil.
> >>
> >> Didn't they deserve ink?
> >
> > The well ran dry. 'Happens when you're active with the quill.
>
> And you never thought of typing them out, publish them maybe?
>
A few were published, although <sigh> never in popular periodicals of
general interest. Perhaps I'll post one of the shorter items so you can
laud me appropriately.
> >>> And to wit, some rather notably famous personage from a bygone era
> >>
> >> Sounds like you're really really old. 94?
> >
> > A geezer never tells his age.
>
> 94 it is then.
Nah. You're at least a radian off.
> >>> No, it's what I call a loaded question. Do you know any Australians
> >>> besides kangaroos and koala bears?
> >>
> >> Yes. Remember Mark Parnell, rf, brucie and Disco Octopus? (probably
> >> forgot a few)
> >
> > Oh, yeah, there's an optimistic quartet...
>
> They most likely are in real life - they're Aussies :-)
Well, I suppose that to the average Nederlander, any non-national would
seem euphoric.
>
> >>>>> And, of course, men are supposed to be the omniscient mind-readers who
> >>>>> *know* when a woman is speaking plainly and when a woman is speaking
> >>>>> fainly. Yeah...
> >>>>
> >>>> You got that right. (well, almost - 'fainly' is spelled wrong)
> >>>> It's not like we make it difficult for you to detect the difference
> >>>> though. As soon as you make an error, you are corrected. If the error
> >>>> is in favour of salaciousness, the correction usually is served as a
> >>>> slap. If the error is in the opposite direction, the consequence is
> >>>> less sex than you could have had.
> >>>
> >>> Oh pshaw! That's female-thinking of the most chauvinistic kind.
> >>> 'Thought it went out with the bustle and corset.
> >>
> >> Is that how long you haven't had contact with a female?
> >
> > No. Besides, during those unavoidable dry spells, I have my trusty
> > rubber life raft with the painting on it to wile away the tension.
>
> Eeew!
> (and I don't believe you)
Okay. It's a pneumatic nympho with gnome-like features and elves are
considered to be acceptably deviant forms of mischief.
>
> >> The 'do' and the 'da' are in the chorus:
> >>
> >> <quote>
> >> De do do do de da da da
> >> Is all I want to say to you
> >> De do do do de da da da
> >> Their innocence will pull me through
> >> De do do do de da da da
> >> Is all I want to say to you
> >> De do do do de da da da
> >> They're meaningless and all that's true
> >> </quote>
> >>
> >> Just in case it doesn't ring a bell, it's 'De Do Do Do' by The Police
> >> (1980).
> >
> > I'm afraid I have to object. The "do" does not precede the "da";
> > there's a "de" in between.
>
> I never claimed there wasn't another word in between.
>
> > Ergo, it is improper to call any part of
> > this construct a "do-da duality".
>
> I never did. I called it 'repeating the word do' and 'combined it with
> da'. I reckon that leaves space for a 'de' if I want to.
'Know a girl by that name who manages a trois and would be glad to hear
it.
>
> > Furthermore, the words, commonplace
> > and uninspired, remind me of little more than unpaid bills, mental
> > instability, and sexual deviancy from multiple directions.
>
> Sounds like you have a full and busy life with no room for negative
> thoughts.
Yep. I'm Australian at heart.
>
> > -A "C-" effort, at best.
>
> If a C- effort results in that big a hit, a C- effort is just fine by
> me :-)
Hits result not from the fundaments of a composition but from the
vagaries of the times. And performance matters. It's a lot like sex.
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|