|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 10/17/21 11:26
With neither quill nor qualm, Els quothed:
> Neredbojias wrote:
>
> > With neither quill nor qualm, Els quothed:
> >
> >> Neredbojias wrote:
> >>> Not true, even from an earth-level point of view. "We" could be
> >>> RNA- based life forms. More fancifully, "we" could even be
> >>> silicon-derived beings suggested by The Sandman of legend or use
> >>> markup instead of coding and thrive as "Hyper Text Markup
> >>> Life"/"htmllings".
> >>
> >> Well, I suppose you could be a silicon-derived hyper-marked up
> >> htmllinger, but I'm sure I'm just plain human.
> >
> > Somehow I don't think you're just a "plain" human.
>
> Ow?
Ow?? Did I step on your toe or are you just prone to spontaneous cries
of pain?
> >>>> Let me rephrase: Some men actually think we like it when they make
> >>>> a showcase (whether public or private) out of it.
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, I guess I can buy that. At first it seemed you were voicing
> >>> a minority opinion, but then I thought that if you turned a woman
> >>> inside out and stuck her goodie up in the air, I wouldn't want to
> >>> view the result for very long, either.
> >>
> >> Not quite what I meant, but probably true nonetheless.
> >
> > Oh, I think I got it. For example, because of this quality, women don't
> > like to watch skin flicks nearly as much as men. Isn't that the gist?
>
> As I haven't seen much of such flicks, I can't really tell :-)
> I'm guessing it's not though. How to explain this to the male
> species...
> It's not the showing, but the showing off, making absolutely sure we
> pay attention to it, even if we've just seen it enough already.
Okay, I see. A wise man knows when to stop with the visual aids and get
on with the action.
> Basically like a little boy that's proud of a new accomplishment.
> Only little boys are cute when they do that.
Well, I may demur but many priests agree with you wholeheartedly.
>
> >>>>>> [different chat-up lines for different girls]
> >>>>> A smart girl knows that men are typically on the make so when she
> >>>>> wants to be typically made, she doesn't wear panties.
> >>>>
> >>>> That would indeed be the smart thing to do if she wanted to be
> >>>> /typically/ made. Which of course means she'd best come across as
> >>>> not too bright, except for her hair colour.
> >>>
> >>> (He he, yellow-haired woman would go on warpath but don't know
> >>> which direction it's in.)
> >>
> >> We tell that joke about the Belgians.
> >
> > Hey, my gramma was Belgian (-although we called her Bulgarian just to
> > burn her waffles.)
>
> Her Belgian or Bulgarian waffles?
Confidentially, it was a euphemism for her Walloon moons.
>
> >>> So, you're saying a woman must be a dummy in order to have a normal
> >>> sex life? No wonder smart women are so bitchy.
> >>
> >> Being picked up by a different guy every night is not what I call a
> >> normal sex life. IMO, a normal sex life usually doesn't start in a bar
> >> at all. And about smart women being bitchy... could well be 'cause
> >> they see through 'typical' men's attempts at getting laid.
> >
> > Well, I agree with all that. However, you have to remember that men
> > were once cavemen and cavemen had to take what they could get whenever
> > they could get it. Old habits are hard to break.
>
> Someone told me the Fins still do it that way. Hit the woman over the
> head with a big bat, and drag her home.
Yes, they appear to be a no-nonsense society keen on logic and
intolerant of vacillation or drivel. I suspect that future history will
regard them as the lone beacon of light in the dark ages of
interpersonal relationships.
>
> >>> After a long enough time, the same old aural convocations lose some
> >>> of their appeal.
> >>
> >> Some, not all of them. It helps to not hear them every single day
> >> though.
> >
> > Yes, and that's the advantage of having a mute spouse/significant
> > other/exotic dancer you can afford.
>
> I think you make matters worse than they are. All you need is a decent
> switch so you can turn 'em off when it gets too much.
Yes, a decent switch could rectify many female anomalies, indeed.
>
> >>>>> Of course, some maturer people still like Frank Sinatra, Elvis,
> >>>>> and The Police, so...
> >>>>
> >>>> You can call me semi-mature then.
> >>>
> >>> I'm just the opposite: semi-immature.
> >>
> >> That's cause you're a man.
> >
> > No, I'm simply setting stricter standards for the heretofore
> > transitional levels of maturity.
>
> That's okay then - I'm all for stricter standards. None of that
> transitional stuff.
Women say they reach maturity before men do but when I was in that age-
bracket not one of them would show me the hair to prove it.
> >> No I wouldn't. Unless you'd lie about it :-)
> >> You could be a 20 year old male (although you probably wouldn't have
> >> known Black by Pearl Jam), or a 100 year old woman. (I'd suspect
> >> you're somewhere in between though)
> >
> > I'm as old as good, aged cognac
>
> That's still anywhere between 20 and 50 years.
>
> > but bite like the incomparable Jack Daniels.
>
> Jack Daniels doesn't bite.
> Well, never bit me - tastes great with Coke.
Oh, yuck-o! I can see you're not a purist, JD should never be mixed
and attains its finest flavor when tipped straight from the bottle.
>
> >>>>>>> Oh, yeah, there's an optimistic quartet...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> They most likely are in real life - they're Aussies :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Well, I suppose that to the average Nederlander, any non-national
> >>>>> would seem euphoric.
> >>>>
> >>>> What's a non-national?
> >>>
> >>> A foreigner, in this case anyone not Dutch.
> >>
> >> Hm.. no, us Dutch don't regard most foreigners euphoric. Aussies have
> >> a reputation though, and I've noticed it to be true for at least 90%
> >> of the ones I met in real life.
> >
> > The only Australians I've met personally were in a zoo between the
> > Gooney Birds and the sewer rats.
>
> I've seen those too - not nearly as friendly as the human Aussies.
Perhaps the ones you met were high on eucalyptus extract.
>
> >>> Let's save some time here. What would you believe?
> >>
> >> <g>
> >> Hm.. I'd believe happily married, as well as single and frustrated.
> >> Just don't believe plastic artificial sex-partner. You're don't seem
> >> sad enough for that.
> >
> > Well, okay; plastic is for prosthetics. "Happily married" is a state
> > achieved only by the delusional.
>
> As long as they're happy, who cares about delusional.
So say the drug mongers in the ghetto. Marriage is the opiate of the
masses but some will swallow anything for a little sex.
>
> > "Single" and "frustrated" are not
> > particularly congruent states
>
> That's why I mentioned them both and used the word 'and' in between
> the two.
>
> > although I suppose some bachelors could
> > put up quite a stink if they ran out of Jergens lotion.
>
> Plain soap may help in such unfortunate cases.
To be honest, I'd say the mixture of men and plain soap is much less
viable than a mixture of women and soft soap.
>
> >>>>> and elves are considered to be acceptably deviant forms of
> >>>>> mischief.
> >>>>
> >>>> elves are considered to be acceptably deviant figments of
> >>>> mischievous imagination.
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps, but some people's acceptably deviant figments are more
> >>> mischievous than others.
> >>
> >> I'd say those were probably yours.
> >
> > Perhaps, but only in a fertile arena.
>
> Obviously.
As well as profoundly...
>
> >>> http://www.neredbojias.com/_uimages/bll2c.m3u
> >>
> >> It sounds very familiar, but as I can't find the lyrics online, it's
> >> probably not a well-known band? Sounds like 80's gothic style though.
> >
> > Dunno when it was recorded but I got the song appx. 1997 when www-dot-
> > mp3-dot-com was still good. My record-keeping is rather non-existent
> > but the song *is* called "Black Lace" and *I think* the band's name is
> > "Unknowne".
>
> That helped me find it, thanks. It's indeed Unknowne, and I found two
> more mp3s by them.
>
> > And yes, there is a gothic flavor to it, but it still somehow reminds me
> > of Debbie Boone's "You Light Up My Life". (Um, I guess this could be
> > due to the oblique reference to strippers.)
>
> That must be it. No way that song could make me sleep.
Well I hope you don't think that *I* would drift off in the presence of
a woman who was taking off her clothes!
>
> >>>>> Yep. I'm Australian at heart.
> >>>>
> >>>> Glad I wasn't drinking anything when I read that.
> >>>
> >>> I was when I wrote it. Subliminal masochism?
> >>
> >> Maybe - did you have to laugh when you wrote it?
> >
> > I laugh at almost everything I write (-and some people laugh even
> > harder.) But not the poetry!
>
> Of course not.
>
> > Odes are my life, and I'm the most odious guy I know.
>
> Except for the odd odious ode maybe, I don't think you really have
> much odium in you.
Then what do you think I am, the hollow, empty shell of a man who has
turned to the Internet in a vain effort to capture the meaning of life,
the universe, and everything? Let me say this about that: it's not for
nudie pictures alone that I sail the cybernetic seaway! While I have
momentarily forgotten the other reasons, you can bet your bottom bippie
that "Neredbojias" does not mean "flesh pot seeker". (At least in
English.)
PS: When someone posted a stream for someone else's edification, one
would have figured that someone else would have noticed the 32 kbps
bitstream and realized that someone was not an American capitalistic pig
with, among other things, a hi-speed Internet connection. However,
perhaps someone (-the original) was somewhat over-optimistic relative to
someone else's (-the other) noticeability factor. In any event, I
managed to accomplish the mission despite these egregious circumstances
by using a little good ol' male ingenuity. Thank heaven for cunning and
penises.
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|