|
|
Posted by Dr Clue on 09/19/05 03:32
Alan J. Flavell wrote:
> No point in investing a lot of effort to overturn one's site which already
> conforms to specification and isn't provoking some known bug in browsers
> etc. - if they temporarily provoke a bug in a CSS syntax checker, then
> don't panic, check the specs and be happy. The fact that some software
> tools come from the W3C is no guarantee of perfection, you know.
This is true, and on top of that, there can be things like server
settings and the like that can trip up the checker.
For example my front page does not validate , but in the same breath
the w3c validator says there are no errors either.
I tracked it down to my use of XHTML and my homebrew DTD vs.
the content-type the server puts out on my hosted site.
should be something like text/xhtml-xml or some such thing,
but I aint loosing any sleep over it.
Glad to see you again Alan
--
--.
--=<> Dr. Clue (A.K.A. Ian A. Storms) <>=-- C++,HTML, CSS,Javascript
--=<> http://resume.drclue.net <>=-- AJAX, SOAP, XML, HTTP
--=<> http://www.drclue.net <>=-- SERVLETS,TCP/IP, SQL
--.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|