|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 09/21/05 12:51
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:05:33 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.net>
wrote:
--
>On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 02:26:17 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:39:25 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:06:44 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:50:15 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Post proof, Bryan...
>>>>
>>>>>i've shown that your malformed .sig will not work in agent 3.0, free
>>>>>agent 2.0 and agent 1.93.
>>>>
>>>> ...actually...you haven't shown ANY of that.
>>>
>>>yes i have. i've replied to your posts with free agent 2.0, agent 3.0 and
>>>agent 1.93 and they've all left your malformed .sig in.
>>
>> ...wow, apparently it's just raining stupid and you forgot your
>> umbrella. Here's a...random thought for ya...what if you just copied
>> and pasted the .sig in after the fact?
>but that would make me as dishonest as you, matthew.
*gasp*
*shock*
Dishonesty on teh Juicenet?!
>here's another thou<BLAH BLAH LBAH>
Purely out of curiosity, how many more months/years do you think
you're going to spend whining about my .sig delimiter? Don't get me
wrong, I think it's great you've discovered your purpose in
stupid...but uh...I dunno, maybe you should think about a hobby or
something.
>> See, it's the whole "proof" deal I think yer havin trouble
>> comprehending.
>uh huh. would you like to tell everyone again that outlook's
>malformed .sig proves your point, "net legend"?
I would never think to be as redundant as you.
>> My, my, somebody sure is a fan boi. Are you archiving ALL my posts or
>> just the parts you like to jack off too, wannabe Poofter.
>google archives your drivel, matthew.
It's all Google's fault that you're a fan boi, eh?
>> Hard to be wrong when I was never trying to be right in the first
>> place. You're fighting against yourself, Retard, you just can't see
>> it...it's the whole "stupidity" thing ya got goin for ya. ^_^
>yeah, yeah... you're sure fooling everybody with that whole "it was only a
>troll" routine.
....no it was never a troll actually. It was never anything actually,
at the time I made it that way I don't recall having any sort of
meaningful purpose whatsoever...*shrugs*...sorry to disappoint, I know
you think it's something special...hence the reason for your obsessive
behavior. If you like we can continue to banter on about it, it
amuses me greatly...especially in that for some twisted deficient
reasoning you probably think your throwing a tantrum about it will
somehow get me to change it. *snicker* Broken, working...see, it's
the "not caring" part that I don't think you quite grasp. `, )
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|