|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 11/14/59 11:27
With neither quill nor qualm, Luigi Donatello Asero quothed:
> > Hi, Luigi. Hope you don't mind me teasing you a bit. I live in the USA
> > where men are men and the women are glad of it.
> >
> > How're the pages coming? I really do think you'd have better results if
> > you entertained less-specialized aspirations for your site and used a
> > more standardized approach to markup.
>
>
> What are the "less-specialized aspirations" and what do you mean by "more
> standardized approach to mark up"?
Start with a less-complicated page first using simpler html and css
techniques, then validate it and check it in all the browsers you can.
Once you're sure it's as good as can be, add a few more thing and check
it again. It's better to have a basic page that works than an esoteric
one which doesn't. And, except for a few "mad moments" at the very
beginning, that's how I did it.
By "standardized" I mean use only markup/css that's valid under the
current strict doctype. If you don't know what it is, your number one
priority is to learn it (-optimally from the specification itself.)
This might not happen overnight, but you'll get a commendable page
online 100 times sooner than if you try to "ad lib" one together.
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|