|
|
Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on 11/14/50 11:27
"dorayme" <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> skrev i meddelandet
news:BF59A003.1750F%dorayme@optusnet.com.au...
> > From: "Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll@telia.com>
>
> > "rf" <@invalid.com> skrev i meddelandet
> > news:EPlYe.9328$0E5.9026@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> >> Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
> >>
> >>> Will it be enough to change the content of the "display" property?
> >>
> >> It's a table. Leave the display property alone for *all* of your table
> >> elements. You don't need to change them from the default.\
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Richard.
> >
> >
> > Display property alone?
> >
>
> Talking of this property I notice you use "scope" in <td>s as
> well. This latter I have barely heard of. I roughly understand
> "display" but have never once used it.
I have probably read about it on the Internet and forgot to validate the
style sheet when I created it.
I have read a lot about visual formatting as well but perhaps I should read
about it again
Perhaps you have a
> reason.
Probably yes.
However, I can add this element again after validating the page.
I can try step by step.
I hope it is not because you feel you *must* use all
> this fancy stuff for no specific reason? You need to have a
> better perspective of what you understand. A lot can be done
> with some smaller subset of things easy to comprehend and
> clearly necessary.
See above
> Btw, about your side menu, I asked you before once why the
> underlining? You have styled a simple list to go into coloured
> boxes. Why this even?
Because I like it.
IMO, you need a better perspective of the
> function and a better styling will result. For a start, it is
> not such a menu that people will be visiting time and again to
> navigate. It is just to set the language - to be used once and
> that is that. So why so prominent a styling in boxes?
Because I think that it looks ok.
At the
> most, a simple text list will do (perhaps a heading to it to
> draw attention), taking up less space. Consider even the most
> basic JavaScript dropdown boxes seen all over for choosing a
> country or postcode or whatever on so many sites for "use rarely
> or just once" list of links).
I do not like JavaScript because it makes users more vulnerable as far as I
understand.
> The big heading with so many words in it looks a bit ugly, such
> a mouthful, such an eyeful. Things are better designed to be
> self explanatory without having to say in so many words what
> they are, you already have a list of language links...
>
> Considering that you are so busy with your business apart from
> the website, have you considered using one of many templates
> that can be had for nothing or even bought cheaply?
I thought about it a long time ago and I concluded that it was not a good
idea.
The good ones are not cheap and this is not a good way to learn either.
Or finding a
> basic one that you like and putting your own content in, offer a
> fine Italian wine or full course dinner coupon to the owner for
> the privilege?
May-be I should clear up one thing again:
1) There are opinions I share with other people but it would be more
difficult to find a page which has everything you like.
Besides this limits the creativity. And creativity is important in life.
> What about Frontpage or Dreamweaver and you just concentrate on
> design and ask for help on this (at perhaps a more appropriate
> newsgroup or even this one?), you then just trust to the output
> of the wysiwig (just see that it works in most browsers and be
> done)
>
> dorayme
Frontpage makes a lot of mistakes.
Dreamweaver is perhaps better but probably more expensive and, besides, I
prefer to develop my own creativity.
--
Luigi Donatello Asero
(sono italiano ma vivo in Svezia)
(я итальянец но я живу в Швеции )
(我是 意大利人 , 但是 我 住 在 瑞典)
(minä olen Italian kansalainen, mutta minä asun Ruotsissa)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|