|
|
Posted by Peter Parsnip on 09/28/05 23:28
Be still! and revere Art Deco, who blessed us with their presence on 28
Sep 2005...
> Peter Parsnip <peterparsnip@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Be still! and revere Art Deco, who blessed us with their presence on 28
>>Sep 2005...
>>
>>> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:40:26 +0000 (UTC), peterparsnip@gmail.com
>>>>(Peter Parsnip) transparently proposed:
>>>>
>>>>>Be still! and revere Aratzio, who blessed us with their presence on
>>>>>28 Sep 2005...
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:16:23 +0000 (UTC), peterparsnip@gmail.com
>>>>>> (Peter Parsnip) transparently proposed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Be still! and revere Jack Gillen, who blessed us with their
>>>>>>>presence on 28 Sep 2005...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:270920052119494462%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
>>>>>>>>> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:48:30 GMT, Little Meow <meow@meow.meow>
>>>>>>>>>>got double secret probation because:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote in news:270920052041105332%art_deco@127.0.0.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Terrence Cooter <fly_cooter_@example.localhost> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In article <250920051813174571%art_deco@127.0.0.1>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>art_deco@127.0.0.1 says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sean Monaghan <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>PJR wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 Sep 2005 16:12:39 GMT, Sean Monaghan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > PJR wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:44:15 +0545, Kadaitcha Man
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> <nospam@fuck-off-and-die.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> And given all the netKKKops
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> around lately, is it worth considering setting up a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> "Terrence Cooter Memorial LOOK! UP IN THE SKY! IT'S
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> A BIRD! IT'S A PLANE! IT'S SUPER NETKKKOP!"-type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> award?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> AFA-B has an award for netkkkops. In AUK,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> netkkkopping is filed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under >> "general lameness", which has already earned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him a BUA nomination, a >> PAP nomination, a CotM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nomination, and possibly others that I haven't >> caught
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up with yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Gerald Newton needs an opponent for this fine award
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > [TS]. I hereby nominate Fly Cooter for the Tinfoil
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Star award for netKKKops. Flyboi is probably the most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > aggressive netKKKop I've witnessed in real time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Phoning domain registrants, to see if their whois data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > is valid? Faxing web hosting companies in the name of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > his parents?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Seconds, anyone?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A technical question: Do nominees for AFA-B awards have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to have posted to AFA-B or not? I'd argue that the AFA-B
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awards ought to be limited to AFA-B posters. Otherwise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're merely supplementary AUK awards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Good question; this has been discussed before. With the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>possible exception of the Tinfoil Star (and I would argue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>for the Chernobyl Prize, too), Bookman would like us to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>get the prospective nominee to post evidence to AFA-B if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>he/she/it isn't already posting there. All of my nominees
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>have met this requirement - including Poofter, who is up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>for one award and one office. The only nominee I had to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>bait over to AFA-B is George Hammond for the Angstrom. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>need to make all of this clear in the FAQ.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Fly's spews have been showing up in AFA-B almost from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>start.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>Are you still making cascades?
>Are you still making cascades?
Are you still making cascades?
--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|