|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 09/29/05 04:09
With neither quill nor qualm, Toby Inkster quothed:
> Neredbojias wrote:
>
> > [Opera] seems to have problems with certain height settings established
> > with w3c-compliant css, various ECMAScript interpretations, decimal
> > percentages including related font-sizes, and the dynamic refresh needed
> > for some "re-" positioning. No browser is perfect, but the one that
> > satisfies me most is Mozilla
>
> Bah! Mozilla can't even get CSS counters right, which have been working in
> Opera since version 5.1.
>
> http://examples.tobyinkster.co.uk/hierarchical_lists
>
> Sucking Mozillas!
He he, I had to open the page in 3 browsers just to see what you were
talking about. Anyway, wouldn't it have been a little more practical
for Opera to get the simple stuff right before tackling something so
obscure and esoteric?
(Seriously, why hierarchical lists and not tenths of a percent?)
Anyway, as for hierarchical lists vs. accurate font sizes, the popular
vote goes one way: Mozilla rules!
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|