|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 11/17/26 11:28
With neither quill nor qualm, Marc quothed:
> Neredbojias wrote:
> > With neither quill nor qualm, Marc quothed:
> >>Are you suggesting that the limiting of the functionality of IE could be
> >>a factor in user's switching to other browsers? I find that hard to
> >>believe if so...
> >
> > That is exactly what I am so suggesting. There's just something about
> > Microsoft which brings out the suggestiveness in me. Perhaps it's their
> > name. -Has the flavor of a light porn clip with teenage nuances.
>
> LMAO @ "light porn clip with teenage nuances"
>
> Seriously, I don't see how removing functions from the user's browser
> could persuade them to change to a different browser. I'd estimate over
> 50% of the Internet's users wouldn't even notice the feature(s) were
> missing and don't know that there are alternatives to Internet Exploder,
> so I can't see how they'd ponder changing browser.
You could have a 90% probability of being right now, but as time goes on
and the average Joe/Josephine/Jomaphrodite become more internet-
familiar, both those percentages will go down. If I showed 100 people
how Opera resized graphics (particularly) as opposed to the standard
browser resizing methods, surely all of them would want the same
improved functionality. You can't stop progress even if you're the
manufacturer.
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|