|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 10/11/05 21:07
With neither quill nor qualm, RainLover quothed:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 18:54:33 -0700, Neredbojias
> <neredbojias@neredbojias.com> wrote:
>
> >With neither quill nor qualm, RainLovr quothed:
> >
> >> Hey everyone,
> >>
> >> I was curious what you would expect it to cost to convert a basic html
> >> web site over to style sheets?
> >>
> >> I suppose before THAT, the big question is, is there a REASON to do
> >> this? I have a lowly web site to show off my art, and am pretty happy
> >> with with I have as far as its visual design goes.
> >>
> >> Any ideas? Suggestions?
> >>
> >> thanks!
> >>
> >> james, seattle
> >>
> >> www.jameskelseystudios.com
> >
> >The home page looks pretty good (-the dog is kinda homely, but...) and
> >seems to work cross-browser, which many pages don't, so I wouldn't worry
> >about it too much. There *are* some mistakes but apparently they are
> >non-influential or ignored. I'd try learning css at my own pace, maybe
> >add one bit and test, then another, etc., until you develop a feel for
> >it. You're also supposed to have a doctype beginning the page, but I
> >have a feeling that if you added one now, thus trying to establish
> >conformance, the page would mis-render.
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I know there are weird mistakes throughout
> my site, but, as you said... hey, it works....
>
> Something's drive me crazy about it, but most people don't notice a
> few glitches in formating consistancy from page to page.
>
> James, Seattle
That's probably due to the vagaries of invalid markup. The good part is
that the site is consistent in all browsers (-I have available to me)
which many "more-standardized" sites are not.
Don't worry; be happy... :)
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|