|
|
Posted by Fred Hall on 10/12/05 10:59
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 03:49:47 -0400, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:56:14 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks,
><diic3e$c4e$0@pita.alt.net>, "http://www.icehouse.net/john34"
><yyyiiinnnggg@yahoo.com> humped my leg thusly:
>
>>
>>"dave hillstrom" <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> wrote in message
>>news:dii2vm$o2$15@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:45:24 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks,
>>> <1db74825f47d403b92d9cec08fa9b227@soc.med.really.ugly.blondes>, "Kadaitcha
>>> Man" <nospam@fuck-off-and-die.com> humped my leg thusly:
>>>
>>> >dave hillstrom, <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>, the rattling, hoary furry tongue, and
>>male
>>> >hermit, apple-polished:
>>> >
>>> >> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 03:25:27 GMT, in
>>> >> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,
>>> >> <Hm%2f.1469$647.10@news01.roc.ny>, Robert Buchanan
>>> >> <rbuchanan@neubauten.org> humped my leg thusly:
>>> >>
>>> >>> What is it, Fly Cooter? I'm really busy in alt.usenet.kooks and I
>>> >>> don't have time to respond to just anything...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> <snip>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Fly Cooter = FAT FUCK
>>> >>
>>> >> Matt Moulton = FAT FUCK
>>> >
>>> >Fly Cooter = Matt Moulton
>>>
>>> i think we have the proof now firmly proved. according to cooter/moulton
>>> logic, certainly. i dare say we will have a negative response from the
>>> party.
>>>
>>> so, right, to get on with the work. we must chop off the head of the
>>> moulton/cooter beast and feed it to the FNVW, candied and cleansed, if
>>> possible!! CHARGE!!!
>>
>>You are a crazy sock.
>
>if that were only true.
Which part?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|