|
|
Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on 11/17/50 11:29
"Steve Pugh" <steve@pugh.net> skrev i meddelandet
news:1129500984.816844.192780@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
> > "Steve Pugh" <steve@pugh.net> skrev i meddelandet
> > news:1129484621.986793.249950@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > > Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
>
> > What about eyes complaining about sharp colours and strong contrasts?
>
> Strong contrast is good. It aids legibility.
Soft colours seem to be better for my eyes, they seem to get tired after a
longer time watching them rather than sharp contrast although sharp contrast
can be more readable.
Regardless of whether you
> adhere to the 1990s voodoo cult that is the web safe palette you should
> aim for strong contrats between your foreground and background colours.
>
> "Sharp" colours have nothing to do with using the web safe palette.
> There are lots of ugly colour schemes that can be made with the web
> safe palette and lots of ugly colour schemes that can be made without
> it. And there are lots of nice colour schemes that can be made with it
> and lots more that can be made without it.
>
> > > > There is no URL here under the image!
> > > >
> > > > http://images.google.se/images?q=karta+Italien&hl=sv
> > >
> > > Yes, that's what you were complaining about.
> > >
> > > I gave you a clue as to why that might be - your site is https and all
> > > the other sites on that list of results are http.
> > >
> > > You have previously asked for possible problems with using https and
> > > ignored the problems given by respondents. Well, here's a new one.
> >
> > I would not necessarily see it as a problem.
>
> Nor would I. Who cares whether the URL is on that results page or not?
> If they actually care, the user can find out which site the image comes
> from by clicking on it anyway.
To clarify: I do not think it is good that no URL adress is shown.
The adress should include "https" and the domain name, the file extension is
not important.
For example
https://scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/.....
But Google did not do that, so I began writing some images in the file
robots.txt so that Google would not pick them up at all.
I would not see it necessarily as a a problem because it is up to search
engines whether they want to register the site or not.
It is much more important that the website suits "my" users´needs.
> > I can simply write the name of
> > the images files which I do not want Google to display.
>
> I assume you're talking about using robots.txt?
>
> What exactly are you worrying about here? The fact that Google indexes
> your images or the fact that it doesn't display your page URL on the
> results page?
See above. The best thing had been if Google had reported the URL as I did
myself in the example above if the problem was that the adress is too long.
> You started off complaining about the URL not being shown but now you
> seem to be against the indexing as a whole.
>
> robots.txt is the answer if you want to avoid indexing.
>
> Dropping the pointless[1] https will probably solve the URL display
> issue.
I do not want to do that. I find https useful and perhaps I shall create a
part of the site for registered users.
This will be protected by password and thanks to https it will be more
difficult for a third part to get to know the password when the user write
it,
won´t it?
So, I prefer to have a https connection.
If search engines have problems with that, they do not need take my site.
If they can solve these problems, they can insert it in the search results.
[cut]
--
Luigi Donatello Asero
(sono italiano ma vivo in Svezia)
(я итальянец но я живу в Швеции )
(我是 意大利人 , 但是 我 住 在 瑞典)
(minä olen Italian kansalainen, mutta minä asun Ruotsissa)
(yo soy italiano mas vivo en Suecia)
(je suis italien mais j'habite en Suède)
(ich bin Italiener aber ich lebe in Schweden)
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/svezia.html
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|