|
|
Posted by Jake on 11/17/01 11:29
In message <Pine.WNT.4.64.0510172029430.1436@ZORIN>, Alan J. Flavell
<flavell@physics.gla.ac.uk> writes
>
>On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Jake wrote:
>
>> No mainstream browser since Netscape 2 (back in the 1990's) has had any
>> trouble in handling frames.
>
>Quite right. It's been their users who have the trouble, not the
>browsers.
Hmm. Can't say I've ever met anyone who had any trouble accessing a
well-written frames-based page ..... want to explain?
>
>Aside: hardly any of them qualify as what I call "noframes-capable",
>i.e giving their user the option of accessing the author's valid
>noframes alternative.
>
Well, I can't think of a good reason why anyone (other than SEs) would
want to access the 'no-frames' alternative.
Still Opera will accommodate anyone with the need to....
regards.
"
--
Jake (jake@gododdin.demon.co.uk -- just a 'spam trap' mail address)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|