|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 09/28/64 11:30
With neither quill nor qualm, Luigi Donatello Asero quothed:
> > > > So? What do you think I am, a saint?
> > >
> > > Did I say that?
> >
> > People don't always say what they think, especially Italians.
>
>
> They do not. But why do you think that especially Italians do not do that?
Probably because they are more emotional than other groups. The other
reason for false-speak is ulterior cunning, but all groups have their
con artists and weaker, less-savory individuals.
>
> I knew
> > this pizza maker once who confided that pizza pies reminded him of
> > clumps of gooey, blood-specked barf in pools of translucent mucus, but
> > of course he didn't say that to his customers.
> >
> > > Personally, I think anything on
> > > > the web should be available to anyone for any use except making a
> profit
> > > > in the strictest sense. The Web is now free
> > >
> > > I suppose you have to ask for permission in Sweden to use a photo for
> > > example, even if you have a private homepage, unless it is specified
> > > otherwise on the website.
> >
> > I suppose that is indeed the consensus of opinion and probably the
> > proper procedure and possibly even the law, but is it synergistically
> > equitable? The Web is like no other medium before, and "publishing" on
> > the Web is quite different from publishing elsewhere. I definitely do
> > not believe that using an image from another web site for non-commercial
> > purposes is equivalent to republishing another rag's graphics in hard
> > form, nor do I believe that most so-called site "copyrighted" images are
> > actually that at all. This is not in reference to you or your map
> > image; I am speaking of the norm.
>
>
> I can imagine that you are not the only one thinking like that and that
> therefore, I had better protect my images in another way for example using
> passwords
If you're really worried about someone using them, that's probably a
good idea. I can't imagine anyone paying a fee to see an image that's
not pornographic, but you do have a smooth tongue.
>
> > > and I hope it remains so
> > > > for a long time.
> > >
> > > But laws are generally not decided only by one person, are they?
> >
> > Decided: no. Fomented: more often than you might think. And people are
> > so gullible. Perhaps that bird on your web site is apropos after all.
>
>
> How are sea-gulls involved now?
It's the guano. Sometimes it gets in the pizza and alters the taste.
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|