|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 10/19/05 12:36
With neither quill nor qualm, Travis Newbury quothed:
> Toby Inkster <usenet200510@tobyinkster.co.uk> said:
>
> >> My standard reference is that google would not be as popular if
> >> it relied on Flash, and the opposite is true for cartoon
> >> network's site.
> > I suspect that most of the visitors to the Cartoon Network's
> > site do not care about what technology is used to create the
> > effect. They would be equally happy if the same effect was
> > implemented via lots of Javascript and images instead of Flash.
>
> Even so, it still agrees with my point. They want the animation and
> the fun and excitement that it brings. THAT is what adds to the
> site. Adding the same thing to google would not bring the same
> enthusiasm.
>
> So my point still stands. What makes a sight "popular" is different
> for each site.
And as for the porn sites, Vive la Difference!
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|