|
|
Posted by Borrox on 10/21/05 12:13
"Barbara de Zoete" <b_de_zoete@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.syzl9jd3x5vgts@zoete_b...
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:04:42 +0200, Borrox <Spamoff@foad.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> "Barbara de Zoete" <b_de_zoete@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:op.syzjdol9x5vgts@zoete_b...
>
>>>> any ideas how I can get browsers like your to view
>>>> correctly?
>>>
>>> I hope you can distill them from the above reply. :-)
>>>
>> It seems I have made countless newbie errors.
>
> Oh, no. You're doing good. I started out working with FrontPage, proudly
> presenting the results to the world, not knowing what html was :-)
>
>> I will be re-working the site as a whole and make a number of very big
>> changes (for the better I hope) and leave the original until I am
>> finished
>> as in many cases especially the images are on the same bachground , so to
>> change to a solid background colour at this instant would be bad.
>
> Remember that you can have both: if one has images enabled in a graphical
> browser, s/he will see your background image and all the other images. If
> however one has images not enabled, s/he gets a solid backgound color. If
> the web author sets the background colour, that is the colour one gets to
> see. If not, the default colour for the browser viewport shows.
> So it is not or or. You can have both.
>
Spot the newbie!!!! (Klaxon sounds!)
I did not know that. As I mentioned to Dorayme I did do a basic site about
4-5 years ago with just HTML, I sat down got a load of books, copied some
code from some sites played with it, added my own picks played some more and
eventually I slowly understood a few things. That was before I found DW and
I thought whay! all the worry about code and stuff, no more! Again spot the
newbie to web site design.
Thank you Barbara
Nig
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|