|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 11/02/05 09:35
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:34:41 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
wrote:
>> Hey, Stupid!
>>
>> --
>>
>> Uh oh, how's that workin for ya?
>Just fine, thanks. You really should get a newsreader that's smart
>enough to know that a sig delimiter followed by this much text can't
>really be a sig delimiter after all.
....well that's pretty fuckin stupid. What if some asshole came along
with a 900+ line .sig? Are you saying yer shit news browser would
just leave it in? LOL
>> >> >Why don't you back up that you made the changes...
>> >> The burden of proof lies on you, Fallacy Boi.
>> >No, actually. It doesn't.
>> Yes, actually. It does, Fallacy Boi. Oh hey, it's not just a clever
>> nickname! ^_^
>No, actually it doesn't, phat-boi.
Whining about it doesn't change the fact that the burden of proof lies
on you, Junior. Repeat after me, Stupid...the burden of proof lies on
the claimant. YOU made the claim YOU have to back it the fuck up.
Woah, logic is teh HARD, yo!
>> >Anyone can copy a couple of anime files and
>> >call them his own.
>> Does it hurt to be stupid?
>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/eyes.jpg
>So what? You did a single frame from a screen grab.
>
>That's about your level of competency.
....well gee, Stupid, if the original eye color was green and the new
clips are all in blue...hrmmm...boy that logic, it's always smackin
you up like a bitch, innt?
>> >When you have things such as smoke and hair to contend with, the colour
>> >of screen spills into the objects you're trying to keep. And despite the
>> >best efforts of everyone, the light on the screens is rarely flat.
>> ...uh oh, looks like you fell right into my troll! ^_^
>>
>> Coincidentally, you wouldn't want the color to be flat...I mean, how
>> else would you preserve the shadows?
>That's only necessary if you're trying to use chroma-keyed objects to
>stand in for CGI replacements. Lot's of the time, that's not the case.
....uh, no actually.
>> ...you really don't know fuck all about transparency effects, do you?
>> Free cl00, most modern methodologies...yeah, they don't rely solely on
>> color replacement. You don't know much about alpha blending, eh
>> kiddo?
>I never claimed to be an expert in the entire field, Matthew.
You're not an expert in anything, child. All you do is run at the
fuckin mouth with shit you slurped up off some half cocked Google
search. Bottom line is you have ZERO experience...and uh, that's what
actually counts, Junior. With enough experience you'll learn pretty
quick just how much disinformation is out there on the net.
>> >> It took you an HOUR?! *rolls eyes*
>> >I don't have any specialized animation tools, twit-boi.
>> Free cl00, Stupid, I created that clip using nothing but a 6 year old
>> version of Paint Shop Pro and Vdub...and it only took me about 7
>> minutes...and that was a couple years ago. ^_^
>Sure. Whatever.
Sure, whatever nothing, Bitch:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/huemap.png
That's a screen grab from a six year old version of Paint Shop Pro,
child. See that's the problem when you have no experience, you think
the only way to do something is with uber expensive, specialized
software tools...when really, in most cases there are very simplistic
solutions to very complex problems. Being able to develop and adapt
efficient methodologies is key to being a successful video
editor/encoder. The same can be said of many other fields in computer
tech. It is very much an art and school isn't going to help you. In
school they'll teach you what each individual tool can do...but what
they won't teach you (and in most cases can't teach you) is
methodology, combining various tools in order to achieve a specific
effect.
For example that glass effect that Apple loves to use so much...pretty
simple really.. 3 shade linear gradient, light to dark over 80%,
sudden drop off to uber light for teh last 20%, slap a white trans
circular layer over teh top, bend teh edge gradients if yer
good...boom, ya got glass...and no need for any fancy effects filters
or chit like that. It's all about technique:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog/stories/1-10.png
>> >The re-worked clip is encoded as H.264
>> Check yer shit, Kiddo, you must have fucked up yer upload cause it
>> won't render.
>Works for other people, but not you. Who to believe, *who* to believe...
The only people I've seen claim that it works are your lil circle jerk
Mac addict friends. I'll try installing the latest beta version of
the k-lite codec pack a lil later, see if it won't work then...of
course even if it does work then, yer still an idiot. Simply because
it's probably a codec that's only on the latest Macs, which would be
like 10% of Mac users which only make up like 5% of the net.populous,
in which case there are probably only 300 people on the whole fucking
PLANET who can actually even see it. More "efficient" codecs are not
always so efficient if yer goal is distribution, child. That's why I
often encode a lot of my stuff in MPEG-2 format, cause then it can
even be burned as an SVCD and is playable on most set top DVD players.
>> Oh, BTW, yer lil PDF there, first of all why did you even save a
>> screen capture as a PDF...second how did you manage to lose so much
>> color quality? Third, why did you enlarge the original image?
>> Fourth, why is the green color bleeding underneath her eyes? Free
>> cl00, Stupid, the task was actually a bazillion times easier than I
>> was actually letting on because the only blue portions of the video
>> WERE HER EYES, so really, you should have been able to alter the eye
>> color in like seconds with no effort at all...and without the use of
>> any kind of fancy filters. Of course, if you weren't such a fucking
>> n00b.job, you would have realized that.
>Mac OS X defaults to capturing PDF.
So yer operating system is retarded, gotcha. In windows you simply
hit "print screen" then paste as a new image in whatever graphics
proggie you like and then you can save it in whatever format YOU
want...of course Mac Lusers are stupid so I guess you would need to
have the operating system make those sort of choices for you. ^_^
>You *did* know that PDF is the
>language of drawing the Mac OS X GUI, didn't you?
....what?
>Second, I didn't lose any colour quality.
Oh?
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/goshurstupid.png
Do you always just start talkin shit without first checking? I mean,
no, really, you would think that after awhile you would TIRE of
looking so gawd damn baby Jesus killing stupid and you would, oh I
dunno, STRIVE TO LOOK LESS DUMB. o_O
>Third, I didn't enlarge the original image.
In the PDF it's enlarged, Kiddo.
>Fourth, did I get a little sloppy in the final frame? I don't think so.
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/dumdumdum.png
You must have REALLY bad eye sight, Kiddo. See how on yours it's all
glowing green underneath her eye?
>And I never said I chose the best method of doing it.
....which is kind of the point. You lack the capability and more
importantly the experience to KNOW the best method for doing it.
>I just went in and got it done.
Work smarter, not harder, child.
>The first frame I modified was completed at 10:43, the last
>at 11:06. I'm satisfied with that.
Well I wouldn't quit your day job, son, cause you'll never make it in
teh media arts profession with that kind of attitude.
>Sorry, phat-boi. Just because you spend your time in a basement watching
>anime doesn't mean the rest of the world does. Never heard of her.
....who doesn't watch anime? I mean, unless you spend all your time in
a basement or you're just completely out of touch with popular culture
I don't see how it's possible. Honestly, what the fuck decade are you
trapped in, Mac Boi?
>> Don't blame me if yer shit Apple is spitting out crap that no one can
>> make use of, even using non standard codec packs.
>It isn't non-standard.
It doesn't work on a default install of Windows XP, Windows 2000,
Win98, or any variant of Linux that I'm aware of...
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
So basically that makes it non-standard in that around 97% of the
entire fucking Inet can't watch it...unless maybe they've got some off
the wall non-standard codec pack installed (and I haven't even
confirmed that yet). Not to mention the fact that it's probably only
"standard" on the Mac for like the latest versions of the Mac OS, in
which case even LESS people can watch it.
>> >Maybe you ought to get a decent system.
>> Maybe you should:
>> http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
>>
>> How's that less than 5% of the market workin for ya, Mac Addict?
>Working great, thanks! I make real money, sonny. And a part of the
>reason is that Macs are a little more rare and tend to get used by
>people in high paying jobs.
....actually Macs are more often used by grade school kiddies, because
schools get special discounts from Mr. Jobs who continually fails to
try and get teh chillins hooked on his candy colored techno
cigarettes. Yer a fool, d00d. Bottom line is you got fucked with a
shit system and rather than just own up to it you go around over
compensating, attempting to try and lie to yourself about it.
>Oh...
>
>How sorry for you.
>
>Two POS boxes and a 17" monitor with double curvature.
>
>But I guess that's about what your awesome "ski11z" let you afford, huh?
>
>>
>> What the fuck kind of system do you have, Junior?
>
>PowerBook G4
Oh...
How sorry for you.
A piece of fuckin shit with a single 120gig 5400rpm HD, 1.67Ghz
processor and only 512mb of shit grade memory.
That red system you see...we're talkin an MSI E7505 dual Xeon
motherboard, currently running with two 2.4Ghz processors, THREE
250gig 7200rpm HDs, DVD burner and 8 gigs of Infineon ECC registered
memory running at twice the speed of the shit in yer lil Mac'n'trash
and a Radeon AIW 9600 video capture card. I guess that lil G4 is all
someone of your "ski11z" could afford though, huh? ^_^
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|