|
|
Posted by Jemdam.com on 11/02/05 19:11
>>>
>>> Please don't recommend 1995 technology. Besides, "greem" is not a valid
>>> color.
>>
>> Sorry man but I have to take you up on that, just because it is old it is
>> not bad. It is light on code size and very simple. Why over complicate
>> things? If a solution is simple it can still be good.
>
> Auto customer: "I want to buy a new car."
> Auto salesman: "We have this nice model with the hand-crank,
> or this new one with an electric starter."
Man you are so narrow minded. If you want to go to stupid quotes there are
many parts of a modern car that just have not changed. If it is not broken
don't fix it. And on your car line the rotary wankle engine was invented a
very long time ago and now gets main stream in the RX 8. I just love these
forums as people are just so anal about stuff. Just relax and help the
orginal person out. Slagging my posts of is not going to get you any where.
>
> Your pixel site is the hand-crank variety. You haven't yet discovered
> CSS. If you did know CSS, your site probably would not have that ugly
> aqua background, for example.
> http://k75s.home.att.net/show/pixelvert.jpg
>
Fixed that, with the body tag - thanks for pointing that out. (See I can be
nice and respond to positive feedback).
>
> Perhaps I was too succinct. No, I'm generally not a flaming person.
>
> Some of my work:
> http://countryrode.com/
> http://freezeblock.com/
>
If you don't mind a comment on the sites you listed: The layout etc is good
and I'm sure the code behind is equally good. I would say the graphics are a
bit flat. A couple of hours learning lighting, shadows and button tools in
paint shop pro would make a huge visual difference.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|