|
|
Posted by Els on 11/03/05 17:04
kchayka wrote:
> Els wrote:
>>
>> http://centricle.com/ref/css/filters/
>
> There's another good one at
> <URL:http://www.dithered.com/css_filters/css_only/>
Bookmarked, thanks.
> Be advised, however, that MS says they have "fixed" the next version of
> IE so hacks that rely on IE parsing errors won't work in IE7.
> <URL:http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/10/12/480242.aspx>
>
> Of course, I don't have high hopes that they have beefed up CSS support
> enough so IE-specific work-arounds aren't needed any more, unless
> they're only for bugs (peek-a-boo etc. should already be fixed).
I think (call me an 'optimist') that we (the 'designers') will just
need to figure out more/different/new hacks for IE7 to combine with
the old ones to cater for the new bugs without screwing up the
existing ones. Sort of what we do now with
/* \*/
* html div{}
/* */
(two hacks combined to serve only IE but not MacIE)
> Their official recommendation is that authors use conditional comments
> if they want special CSS for IE. So we should pollute the HTML on every
> page rather than pollute one CSS file. Actually, we need both, since IE6
> is going to be around for many years yet. :-(
But... aren't those conditional comments version specific? Like: if
IE7 or if IE6?
I still prefer to have all my hacks interspersed inside my one CSS
file though, instead of having separate IE CSS files to overrule the
default one.
--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
Sonhos vem. Sonhos vão. O resto é imperfeito.
- Renato Russo -
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|