|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 11/04/05 08:38
With neither quill nor qualm, Luigi Donatello Asero quothed:
>
> "Neredbojias" <invalid@neredbojias.com> skrev i meddelandet
> news:MPG.1dd45e67351afda898969d@news.isp.com...
> > With neither quill nor qualm, kchayka quothed:
> >
> > > Neredbojias wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Instead of <sup>, span the ® and use line-height and
> vertical-align
> > > > with font-size-adjust.
> > >
> > > Which browsers support font-size-adjust? IIRC, it was dropped from the
> > > CSS 2.1 spec due to lack of support.
> >
> > Interesting. I could think of other things about w3c css/html specs
> > they could at least change for the better, too.
>
>
> For example?
No, it would be like arguing politics. Generally speaking, css is
mediocre and its implementation is mediocre on any browser to date,
which is in part due to its mediocre nature in the first place.
May times I've written a bit of css which renders differently in each of
the 3 major browsers even though all of the renderings may be
technically correct. Floats are a beauty, but that's just one thing
among many. The css model is poor and ambiguous, that's the real
problem.
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|