|
|
Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on 11/04/05 17:17
"Neredbojias" <invalid@neredbojias.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:MPG.1dd4afba57ebfb2998969e@news.isp.com...
> With neither quill nor qualm, Luigi Donatello Asero quothed:
>
> >
> > "Neredbojias" <invalid@neredbojias.com> skrev i meddelandet
> > news:MPG.1dd45e67351afda898969d@news.isp.com...
> > > With neither quill nor qualm, kchayka quothed:
> > >
> > > > Neredbojias wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Instead of <sup>, span the ® and use line-height and
> > vertical-align
> > > > > with font-size-adjust.
> > > >
> > > > Which browsers support font-size-adjust? IIRC, it was dropped from
the
> > > > CSS 2.1 spec due to lack of support.
> > >
> > > Interesting. I could think of other things about w3c css/html specs
> > > they could at least change for the better, too.
> >
> >
> > For example?
>
> No, it would be like arguing politics. Generally speaking, css is
> mediocre and its implementation is mediocre on any browser to date,
> which is in part due to its mediocre nature in the first place.
>
> May times I've written a bit of css which renders differently in each of
> the 3 major browsers even though all of the renderings may be
> technically correct. Floats are a beauty, but that's just one thing
> among many. The css model is poor and ambiguous, that's the real
> problem.
You may be right.
--
Write in peace for peace
Luigi Donatello Asero
[it], [de], [en], [sv], [...]
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|