Posted by Toby Inkster on 11/15/05 02:56

code_wrong wrote:

> is not <object> the w3c way?

The W3C has deprecated APPLET, but it's still part of HTML 4.01
Transitional and XHTML 1.0 Transitional, and offers the best
backwards-compatibility of any method of including Java applets.

> please be kind and illustrate the way you would do it::

Like this:

<APPLET code="AudioItem" width="15" height="15">
<PARAM name="snd" value="Hello.au|Welcome.au">
Java applet that plays a welcoming sound.
</APPLET>

Using OBJECT it would be:

<OBJECT codetype="application/java"
classid="AudioItem"
width="15" height="15">
<PARAM name="snd" value="Hello.au|Welcome.au">
Java applet that plays a welcoming sound.
</OBJECT>

But the first example will work in Netscape 2+ whereas the second requires
6.x.

--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
Contact Me ~ http://tobyinkster.co.uk/contact

• Next in forum: Re: This is bizarre html behaviour...
• Prev in forum: Re: Problem with iframe in table.
• Thread view: Re: can we stop using activex

[Reply to this message]