|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 11/16/05 02:37
With neither quill nor qualm, Blinky the Shark quothed:
> Neredbojias wrote:
>
> > With neither quill nor qualm, Blinky the Shark quothed:
> >
> >> Neredbojias wrote:
> >>
> >> > With neither quill nor qualm, Blinky the Shark quothed:
> >> >
> >> >> Neredbojias wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > What emoticons? Besides, Hywel's British. They're not
> >> >> > emotional but fundamental.
> >> >>
> >> >> Shouldn't he be using fundimenticons, then?
> >> >
> >> > Historically, Englishmen have been known for what they could
> >> > do and what they would do, but as for what they should do,
> >> > it's definitely bottom drawer.
> >>
> >> I think that should have had a historicon.
> >
> > Not in a plain-text forum.
>
> That could've used a confusicon -- who said anything about
> graphical symbols? :) <-not a guicon
Now that sounds fishy. An icon used as a "thing-a-con" _is_ a graphic.
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|