|
|
Posted by Blinky the Shark on 11/16/05 06:05
Neredbojias wrote:
> With neither quill nor qualm, Blinky the Shark quothed:
>
>> Neredbojias wrote:
>>
>> > With neither quill nor qualm, Blinky the Shark quothed:
>> >
>> >> Neredbojias wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > With neither quill nor qualm, Blinky the Shark quothed:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Neredbojias wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > What emoticons? Besides, Hywel's British. They're not
>> >> >> > emotional but fundamental.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Shouldn't he be using fundimenticons, then?
>> >> >
>> >> > Historically, Englishmen have been known for what they
>> >> > could do and what they would do, but as for what they
>> >> > should do, it's definitely bottom drawer.
>> >>
>> >> I think that should have had a historicon.
>> >
>> > Not in a plain-text forum.
>>
>> That could've used a confusicon -- who said anything about
>> graphical symbols? :) <-not a guicon
>
> Now that sounds fishy. An icon used as a "thing-a-con" _is_ a
> graphic.
Only if it's a graphic. <ironicon>
--
Blinky
Killing all Google Groups posts.
http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|