|
Posted by code_wrong on 11/18/24 11:32
"Toby Inkster" <usenet200511@tobyinkster.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2bon43-0md.ln1@ophelia.g5n.co.uk...
> code_wrong wrote:
>
>> is not <object> the w3c way?
>
> The W3C has deprecated APPLET, but it's still part of HTML 4.01
> Transitional and XHTML 1.0 Transitional, and offers the best
> backwards-compatibility of any method of including Java applets.
>
>> please be kind and illustrate the way you would do it::
>
> Like this:
>
> <APPLET code="AudioItem" width="15" height="15">
> <PARAM name="snd" value="Hello.au|Welcome.au">
> Java applet that plays a welcoming sound.
> </APPLET>
>
> Using OBJECT it would be:
>
> <OBJECT codetype="application/java"
> classid="AudioItem"
> width="15" height="15">
> <PARAM name="snd" value="Hello.au|Welcome.au">
> Java applet that plays a welcoming sound.
> </OBJECT>
>
> But the first example will work in Netscape 2+ whereas the second requires
> 6.x.
well for some reason I could not get the object method to work in IE using
the example above ...
When I used applet it worked fine .... this makes me wonder why all the
books .. the w3c .. sun.com trying to push the object method .. of the
three books I have here only one mentions the APPLET element .. I think the
other two are too busy trying to promote the latest standard .. infuriating
to waste time on this simple operation
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|