|
|
Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 12/06/05 05:50
On 6 Dec 2005 03:43:35 GMT, Spaulding Greystoke
<KILLFILEjasonzc@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in
>news:l3u9p19pq8afuub9fmr22j0nnop4tg345d@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:16:36 -0600, harold <pressman@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Actually, Chum, she's right. DPI and PPI aren't the same and are not
>>>"interchangeable." "DPI" is a co<SLAP>
>>
>> Look, kid, have you been to Wikipedia?
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dots_per_inch
>>
>> "Owing in part to its conceptual similarity with other measurements of
>> graphical resolution, the DPI measurement is frequently misused. For
>> instance, it is common for an image scanner's sampling resolution to
>> be specified in terms of DPI, though a more accurate measurement would
>> be samples per inch. The number of pixels per inch in a computer
>> display is sometimes specified in this way as well. Usage of the DPI
>> measurement in these cases is considered by some to be inaccurate and
>> misleading, though the intended meaning is usually clear based on
>> context."
>>
>> The most important part being:
>> "the intended meaning is usually clear based on context"
>>
>> If you get them to change it to say that it is NEVER clear, even when
>> keeping it within a specific context, you'll have some ground to stand
>> on. Until then...they can be used interchangeably so long as you're
>> using them within a specific context (print, scanning, screen).
>>
>> At this point, you're not arguing against me, you're arguing against
>> Wikipedia. Go whine to them, Child.
>>
>> In the mean time, if someone tells me that they have a graphic that's
>> 72 PPI, I KNOW what DPI I should print with in order for that image to
>> look decent when it's printing (granted it's gonna be small, but I
>> KNOW what to use). Don't you? By your own deficient logic YOUR
>> PRINTING BLIND! HOW RETARDED ARE YOU?!
>>
>> And to show you just how interchangeable they are:
>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/are-u-slow.png
>>
>> When you create a new image in Paint Shop Pro it lets you set the PPI,
>> later, when you save the image, Windows see's that number as the
>> DPI...IF THEY AREN'T INTERCHANGEABLE HOW IS IT DOING THAT YOU STUPID
>> RETARDED FUCKS!
>>
>> OH...MY...GAWD!
>>
>> And to that other RETARD and the people who were slurping his ass who
>> was saying that PPI is meaningless and doesn't matter...YOU'RE A BUNCH
>> OF FUCKING MORONS!
>>
>> Let me educate you stupid, ignorant FUCKS:
>> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/ppi-
>matters/test.html
>>
>> PPI doesn't matter? Well if that's true, WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU
>> LOOKING AT! There's only ONE image being used on that site, you
>> deficient freshmen dropouts!
>>
>> Think McFly, THINK!
>> What, you need to see the ~magic~ code?
>>
>> <img src="test.png">
>> <br>
>> <img src="test.png" width=100% height=100%>
>>
>> WOAH, amazing! Now granted if you're just a retarded fuck who doesn't
>> know shit all about web coding maybe PPI is a meaningless number, but
>> when you're playing on the web design level that peeps of MY caliber
>> are on...yeah, it matters, it matters A LOT.
>>
>> You stupid tards lose...you lose bad. `, )
>
>I didn't read your drivel.
Not much for being humiliated, eh Stupid?
>But 'pixels per inch' is independent of 'dots per inch'.
Proof #1
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/are-u-slow.png
>Everything displays at 72ppi on screen,
Proof #2
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/ppi-matters/test.html
You lose, Stupid, next time learn to read...or at least how to click a
fucking link, you drooling deficient.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|