|
|
Posted by Peterken on 11/19/44 11:34
"Toby Inkster" <usenet200512@tobyinkster.co.uk> wrote in message
news:j7v073-v8c.ln1@ophelia.g5n.co.uk...
> Peterken wrote:
>
>> My idea : When using a "dynamically stretched image" use one for the
>> highest
>> expected screen resolution, the lower resolutions won't get worse then.
>
> They will get worse.
>
> e.g. 1600x1200 isn't an exact multiple of 1280x1024 -- they're even at
> different aspect ratios, so your 1600x1200 image will look crap. It will
> also be a huge download.
>
> --
> Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS
> Contact Me ~ http://tobyinkster.co.uk/contact
>
as is 800*600 no exact multiple of 640*480
as is 1024*768 no exact multiple of 800*600 or 640*480
as is 1280*1024 no exact multiple of 1024*768 or 800*600 or 640*480
It *never* is, neither are the aspect ratios, so I still remain with using
the highest image fore not stretching beyond representativity.....
And it's not such a big file, a jpg of 1600*1200 may well be below 50k when
selecting a bit
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|