|
Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on 11/07/29 11:34
"mbstevens" <NOXwebmasterx@xmbstevensx.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:Hysnf.2418$n1.229@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
>
> >>This "positive" definition is likely a kind of weird Semiotic technical
> >>term for what a definition is. You can't expect the rest of us to buy
> >>into anything like that. It all dates back to the structuralist
> >>"signifier/signified" - world-made-of-language claptrap.
> >
> >
> > Expect? Not at all...
> > You may think what you want..
> > but for me
>
> That "for me" has no weight here.
As I wrote you may think what you want.
> > you cannot have a negative definition
>
> It was never a negative _definition_ at all! Just an observation
> about a quality.
Negative as absence of a certain item or quality, for example a suit which
is neither blue nor yellow
--
Luigi Donatello Asero
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv/rom-lagenhet-nara-colosseo.php
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|