|
|
Posted by Rob McAninch on 12/17/05 18:03
Jake>:
> In message <1134821726.826261.132650@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> Chaddy2222 <rockradio2000@yahoo.com.au> writes
>> Paul W Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hmm. I would suggest dumping the frames as they are not good at all for
>> search engion opptomization.
>
>
> Interesting. Would you like to expand on that?
http://maps.google.com/search?q=search+engine+optimization+frames
A couple specific articles, check out the one from useIT.
http://searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/article.php/2167901
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9612.html
Actually, getting frames to be search engine friendly isn't so hard,
if you take the time to do it. The usability is still pretty awful
though just as that article from 1996 points out (although the
browsers in use have certainly changed).
I've seen some JavaScript that can make bookmarking work, or even a
server side method could do a similar job by passing parameters on
the URL and building the framesets programatically.
--
Rob McAninch
http://rock13.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|