|
|
Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 12/18/05 02:36
PJB wrote:
<snip>
>
> Ok, bear with me... The CSS you suggested (Dec. 11) had two height settings
> within the CSS. I deleted the first but I am not sure about the last line:
> #content {height: 100%}
> Can I delete this also?
The purpose is to expand height of content div to match body element in
case you a wanted to position or size and child elements relative to the
page. if you have not such need then it could be deleted.
>
> The damsel fly image scales OK but it pixalates a bit on wider screens. This
> I can live with. Otherwise, I have been trying different approaches on the
> other pages -- re-sizing / rescaling / resampling the background image files
> etc. Ideally, where I have lots of text I would like the background image to
> remain fixed with all text scrolling in front. Pictures blending into the
> background colour will work. Eventually,I'll have all pages using CSSs. I
> just
> have to learn that and PhotoShop!
Some browsers a better than others but all are inferior to a image
resampled and optimized with image editor software. It will alway be a
compromise of file size/quality
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|