Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 12/30/05 17:30

Len Philpot wrote:
> In article <ahu8r1d08268pmpvunbi05sjbhllv5e8a4
> @news.spartanicus.utvinternet.ie>, invalid@invalid.invalid says...
>
>
>>browsers, you know the options for providing a fall back for the OS
>>component that tries to fool people into thinking that it's a web
>
>
> Are you referring to IE?
>
>
>
>>browser, and you know how to include code.
>
>
> How? (see ** below, though for the conditions)
>
>
>
>>What more do you need to figure out?
>
>
> The way I see it, here's how it stands :
>
> Frames CSS
>
> Split view Yes Yes
> Static/scrolling Yes Partially *
> Single source Yes No **
> Degrades OK Yes *** Yes
<snip>

I went with JavaScript (for navbar position only) which most folk still
have enabled. If disable clicking liberally use 'up' buttons put the
menu at hand for gracefully degradation...and anyway isn't that what
JavaScript is for, control behavior for 'extra' but not 'essential'
aspects of the site?

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

• Next in forum: Re: animated gif
• Prev in forum: Re: country select list
• Thread view: Re: CSS instead of frames (but how)?

[Reply to this message]