|
|
Posted by L�pher Cypher on 01/03/06 21:28
Barbara de Zoete wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 20:06:07 +0100, Lüpher Cypher
> <lupher.cypher@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Barbara de Zoete wrote:
>>
>>> No, they are essentially different. Really. In the second table the
>>> data in the spans are logically still in one data cell. In the first
>>> example the data is split up, logically, and put into two seperate
>>> data cells.
>>
>> Well, would it really make difference? You simply use the first table
>> for logic separation of data
>
> I thought one was _not_ supposed to separate the data. The data is in
> one data cell and I presume it is there, in one cell, for a reason, and
> thus is supposed to logically stay in one data cell. That is why I think
> you shouldn't be making two data cells of it (still, if subsiding to
> table layout, all of this goes out of the window of course).
Well, then, I can argue that, since you need part of that data on the
left and the other part on the right, the original data consists of two
"sub-datas" :) And hence splitting into two cells :)
--
- lüpher
---------------------------------------------
"Man sieht nur das, was man weiß" (Goethe)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|